Best agencies to sell stock video footage
If you’re just getting started selling ‘royalty-free’ stock footage and you’d like to know where to upload your content, here are my top picks!
Shutterstock
New York City, New York, USA
Payout: 26.5% to 30% of product price. Agency sets product price.
Products for sale: Footage (available for sale in original res. and smaller web sizes), Photos, Vector graphics.
Another NYC based agency, Shutterstock has always brought in the sales. There are some frustrations with SS – they reject a lot of my content – but overall I like this place. They’re definitely one to include in the mix. Though they usually come in third for me each month (in terms of dollars in the door), I’m placing them second because they’re easier to deal with than #3!
PROS: Good looking site with high quality footage content. Helpful community. Easy upload and keywording process.
CONS: Low commission rates. FTP performance is varied. Various bugs and glitches in the site’s code can be tedious ie. when keywording file descriptions that use “quotation marks”, you get weird extra characters that are generated – which then have to be erased
Pond5

New York City, New York, USA
Payout: 50% of product price. Artist sets product price. No upper price limit.
Products for sale: Footage, Audio FX and Music.
Pond5 consistently pulls in the sales and with a 50% commission rate they’ve almost always been my top monthly earner. In fact, since I started selling stock footage back in June 2008, P5 has been no.1 for 20 out of 24 months!
Pond5 is unique in that it has no upper pricing limit – so if you have specialized footage that you think is worth a couple of grand, you can sell it here.
PROS: Great payout rate at 50%. No upper pricing limit. Helpful community. Easy upload and keywording process. Fast (within a week) file approval. FTP always works.
CONS: Unlike istock and shutterstock, Pond5 does not automatically scale HD and SD footage down to smaller web sizes, which can mean lost sales. Also the maximum allowable amount of keywords for each clip on Pond5 is 25 words – which for some clips, can be on the lean side.
iStockphoto
Calgary, Alberta, Canada. (owned by media giant – Getty
Comission rates for non-exclusive contributors in 2010 at istock were between 15% and 20% based on number of sales. Rates for exclusive contributors in 2010 were between 25% and 45%. See schedule here: http://www.istockphoto.com/rate_schedule.php
Products for sale: Footage (available for sale in original res. and smaller web sizes), Sound FX, Music, Photographs, Vector graphics.The wait time to get footage approved at istock is the longest in the biz – currently at about 5 weeks.
iStockphoto also has the most complicated uploading process, and though it was developed to better organize content on istock’s servers, its not doing any favours for submitters – especially to those starting out.
Despite the frustrations of working with this site and the relatively low percentage payout (vs. Pond5′s 50%), istock spends more money on marketing than anyone else. This means more buyers see your work, which translates into more sales.
PROS: istock is a beautiful looking site. It also comes with some very clever features that help buyers find what they want. (ie. Buyers can search based on colour or textspace requirements. As well there’s the ‘BestMatch’ keyword search system that allows buyers to give more relevancy to certain keywords in their searches). Thanks to Getty’s involvement (who own the site) there are also serious marketing dollars pushing istock, so you get lots of eyeballs on your work.
CONS: Low commission rates. Longest wait in the industry to get content approved (As of this writing, it takes 5 weeks to get work approved). Time-consuming to upload and keyword.
Technical glitches – ie. at the time of this writing FTP and thumbnail generation is not working. Non-exclusives* are limited to uploading 20 video files a week.
|